first thoughts
Angela Lehman-Rios
I’m a firm believer that the arts are a necessary
part of the educational experience. I think it’s great that my
daughter’s elementary school has music and visual art classes as part of
the curriculum at least once a week. I felt lucky that Emily got to
participate in the Richmond Ballet’s in-school dance program, “Minds in
Motion” in fourth grade. I’m happy to hear from her and from people at
other schools that some core subject teachers are integrating the arts
into math, science and history classes, sort of.
So why am I still frustrated about the state of the arts experience in
today’s academic environment?
Theoretically, I like the idea that the content of Emily’s art class
reinforces what she’s learning in history. It sounds pedagogically
right-on to have kids read stories in language arts class about oceans
or molecules or whatever they’re studying in science class.
In reality, however, this depresses me. It seems
like art always has to support a “core subjects” Standard of Learning.
Why can’t kids just go to music class and sing or play drums or listen
to violin concertos because art is intrinsically valuable? Why do we
need the arts sold to us based on the miracle-cure model?
I get tired of hearing about how getting kids involved in the arts will
raise their standardized test scores, improve their health, increase
their IQs, and give them more job options, longer life and cuter pets.
I certainly believe all this is more or less true, though I don’t think
it can be proved conclusively.
If the argument for keeping the arts in a school’s curriculum is framed
only by art’s potential to improve students’ performance in other areas,
we lose the argument as soon as “performance” is defined by standardized
test scores or even by retention rates. It’s very difficult to separate
out all the other factors influencing these measurements and show that
art improves them.
I also believe that this argument misses the point. I want my children
to draw, sing and write because to do so gives life pleasure, it
articulates life’s pain, it clarifies life’s purpose.
Creating art is a uniquely human endeavor. Even
though not everyone is an artist, art can reveal the humanity of others
to us. For me, this is enough reason to secure the place of the arts in
our schools. If a society doesn’t teach its children about recognizing
each other’s humanity—our common goals, feelings, fears—it won’t be a
society for long.
Through the practice of making or appreciating art, we can understand
our capacity to be creative in other areas.
This understanding is a crucial part of an education. Solving
problems—math problems, grammar problems, communication problems—is an
act of creativity that is only supplemented by knowing formulas and
rules, but is made possible by knowing one’s inherent creativity. And
this creativity shouldn’t be limited by a mindset that considers art as
simply utilitarian.
Archives:

Pick up your copy of Richmond
Parents Monthly available at over 400 area locations!