|
►Monthly
Features
|
||
![]() |
||
|
A Foiled Merger Karl Rove’s statement that Richmond is a small city stirred a lot of
comment. It’s hard to imagine, but about 50 years ago it was suggested
that Chesterfield, Henrico and Richmond should become one big city.
Today it might sound like a far-fetched idea, but back then serious
consideration was given to combining all three, the object being to
provide greater efficiency and avoid duplication of government services. The consultants recommended a merger of Henrico and Richmond, because of similar population density. Chesterfield, because it was basically rural in nature, should not be considered, the firm said. After the survey, civic leaders decided the merger was worth
exploring. The Regional Planning Commission began to study the possible
effects of such a move. City Council was less than enthusiastic about the idea, preferring annexation, but agreed the voters should have a chance to express their opinion. So it was arranged for a referendum in both localities to be held December 12, 1961. If the voters accepted the idea, then the General Assembly would have to give the final approval. Richmond and Henrico representatives agreed to go along with the will of the voters. The referendum had to be approved by both Richmond and Henrico. Richmonders voted 15,051 for and 6,700 against. Although Henrico voters in the Tuckahoe and Brookland districts endorsed the idea, there was strong dissent in Varina and Fairfield. The final tally of the Henrico votes was 8,862 for and 13,657 against, defeating the referendum. At that time the merger would have made Richmond the fifth largest city in the nation and 36th in population. Would it have worked out? We’ll never know. But at the time,
everybody had their chance to express their opinions by their votes. So
we may be a small city according to Mr. Rove, but it’s the size local
voters approved. Archives: |
||
|
HOME | who we are | subscriptions | contact us | RPM
|